Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The clinical significance of some serum tumor markers among chronic patients with Helicobacter pylori infections in Ibb Governorate, Yemen

Infectious Agents and Cancer volume 18, Article number: 60 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a carcinogenic bacterium, it is the greatest risk factor for gastric cancer (GC), according to these evidences, there may be a certain association between chronic H. pylori infections and serum levels of tumor markers. This study was conducted to determine serum levels of some tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) in patients with chronic H. pylori infections and evaluate the association between serum tumor marker levels and chronic patients with H. pylori infections in Ibb Governorate, Yemen.

Subjects and methods

This study involved 200 patients who had been diagnosed with H. pylori infections using a serum immunochromatography antibody test. Stool and blood samples were collected from all patients to confirm the presence of H. pylori through detection of serum H. pylori IgG antibody and stool antigen test (SAT). Additionally, serum samples were analyzed to measurement the level of certain tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4. These tests were conducted at various Hospitals, Gastroenterology and Hepatology clinics in Ibb governorate, Yemen from October 2019 to November 2020.

Results

The findings of current study showed that the prevalence of H. pylori infections by rapid anti H. pylori test were 200 (100%), 157 (78.5%) by serum H. pylori IgG antibody and 108 (54%) by SAT. In addition, the results showed that 42 (21%) of the patients had abnormal level of CEA, 30 (15%) had abnormal level of CA19-9 and 31 (15.5%) had abnormal level of CA72-4. Most importantly, the results indicated that the serum tumor marker levels CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 were correlated with the levels of serum H. pylori IgG antibody as well as positive results from the SAT (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the results indicated that serum tumor marker levels were associated with different infection status. Finally, the results indicated that the serum levels of tumor markers were associated with older ages, symptomatic patients and long duration of H. pylori infections (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The findings of this study indicated that there is a significant association between chronic H. pylori infections and the serum levels of tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4). This suggests that the patients with active chronic H. pylori infection may have an increased risk of developing GC. Therefore, monitoring and early detection of H. pylori infection and tumor markers levels in these patients may be crucial for identifying individuals at higher risk and implementing appropriate interventions.

Introduction

H. pylori is a Gram-negative, microaerophilic, rod-shaped bacterium that infects the gastric mucosa in more than half of the human population worldwide. Infections with this bacterium can lead to the development of several gastropathies such as chronic gastritis (CG), peptic ulcer (PU), atrophy and metaplasia. Additionally, H. pylori infection is considered as one of the main risk factors for the development of gastric adenocarcinoma. As a result, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) subsidized by the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified H. pylori bacterium as a type I carcinogen [1,2,3].

Virulence factors of H. pylori play a crucial role in the progression and outcomes of infection. Urease as an important virulence factor for H. pylori plays a role in pathogenicity establishment and ammonia production that disrupt the tight cell junctions, breaks cellular integrity, and damage the gastric epithelium. In addition to urease was recently reported to possibly contribute to tumor growth and metastatic dissemination by inducing angiogenesis and playing a key role in GC progression. Furthermore, the most studied molecule is the cytotoxin associated gene (CagA), which is translocated by the type IV secretion system of H. pylori into gastric cells, generating intracellular signals that facilitate malignancy. Individuals have an increased risk of developing GC if they express cagA+ instead of cagA−, and the strains of H. pylori that carry CagA are associated with an increased risk of developing CG or PU. Vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA) is another virulence mechanism of H. pylori correlated with GC. One of the mechanisms attributed to VacA is its interference with Interleukin-2 production and Interleukin-2 receptor expression, which in turn reduces the proliferation of T lymphocytes [4,5,6,7].

Helicobacter pylori causes progressive damage to the gastric mucosa and plays a causative role in a number of important diseases, including duodenal ulcer (DU) disease; gastric ulcer (GU) disease, gastric adenocarcinoma and gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. It is estimated that H. pylori positive patients have a 10–20% lifetime risk of developing ulcer disease and 1–2% risk of developing GC. Most patients with early GC have no obvious symptom. Some patients have symptoms of nausea, vomiting, or similar upper gastrointestinal tract that cannot be paid attention. Consequently, the diagnosis rate of early GC is relatively low. With disease development, patient has obvious symptoms of upper gastrointestinal discomfort such as abdominal pain, loss of appetite, weight loss, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and suffocation. However, most patients had been in an advanced stage when the above symptoms occurred. At this stage, the prognosis is poor because of the difficulty of treatment [8,9,10,11].

GC is a common malignancy in the gastric mucosa and gastric glands in the digestive tract. It is the second highest cause of cancer deaths worldwide due to the high prevalence of H. pylori infections. The most recent reports from the IARC estimates that 78% of all GC are attributable to H. pylori infection. In addition seroprevalence studies estimate that 90% of GC patients have encountered H. pylori infections. Furthermore, H. pylori induces DNA damage and aberrant DNA methylation genome instability and mutation are emerging hallmarks of cancer development. H. pylori infection increases the risk of GC development by about two times. Most human GC develop after long-term H. pylori infections. The progression is extending to lymphoproliferative gastric lymphoma, and it is the most dangerous factor leading to GC [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].

Tumor markers used in GC patients as prognostic factors and a close relationship with specific cancers such as CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 and cancer antigen 125, to play an important roles in predicting recurrence, metastasis and evaluating prognosis of GC [19,20,21,22,23].

According to the evidences stated above, there seems to be a certain association between H. pylori infections and tumor markers, the higher levels of CEA in patients with H. pylori infections. These results indicated that H. pylori infections may play a role in the progression of specific cancer and has the potential to regard as a useful marker for cancer. The CEA, CA72-4 and CA19-9 were used for the diagnosis of patients with chronic infections with H. pylori infections, because several studies reported a strong association between chronic H. pylori infections with GC and colorectal cancer. As a result, H. pylori is now recognized as a Group 1 carcinogen for humans [24,25,26]. The current study was designed to: determine the serum levels of some tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4) in chronic patients with H. pylori infections and evaluate the association between serum tumor marker levels (CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4) and different status of H. pylori infections according to different H. pylori diagnostic tests.

Materials and methods

Study subjects, design and population

This cross—sectional study carried out by the collection of stool and blood samples from two hundred (200) patients, who have H. pylori infections from October 2019 to November 2020. All patients had been diagnosed by detection of serum H. pylori antibodies one-step immunochromatography test and confirmed by serum H. pylori IgG antibody to indicate chronic infection and SAT to indicate acute infection at some Hospitals, Gastroenterology, and Hepatology Clinics in Ibb governorate, Yemen. The patient's questionnaire was designed as demographic information of patients including age, gender, smoking, chewing Khat plant (Catha edulis), diet, education levels, fruit and vegetables eating, tea and coffee drinking, weight, height, family history of H. pylori infections and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), duration of H. pylori infection, presence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and treatment. Five to ten ml of venous blood sample was collected from patients.

H. pylori testing and tumor markers measurement

Serum samples separated from whole blood divided and kept into two sterile Eppendorf tubes. The first separated serum tube was used to H. pylori immunochromatographic antibody test and serum H. pylori IgG antibody by Enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) test. The second separated serum was tested in Cobas e 411 analyzer (Roche Diagnostic, Hitachi, Japan) with Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) technique for detecting serum tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4). In addition, stool samples collected from all patients for detection of H. pylori stool antigen and performed immediately. Furthermore, the body mass index (BMI) was calculated.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by a Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS version 21). The results presented as percentages, means, standard deviations (SD). Also, Chi-square X2 test was used for categorical variables. Furthermore, comparison was made by sample independent t-test and one-way ANOVA. Correlation and simple linear regression were performed for scales variables. P values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

The results of the demographic characterization of 200 patients with H. pylori infection showed that mean ± SD of the patient's age 36.80 ± 16.47; the majority of them were in the age group [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] years old. Out of all patients, 92 (46%) were males and 108 (54%) were females. 148 (74%) of the patients chaw the Khat (Catha edulis), 48 (24%) were smokers, 127 (63%) had family history of H. pylori infections and 60 (30%) of patients had family history of PUD. There were significant association (P < 0.05) between serum H. pylori IgG antibody and age groups, education levels, chewing Khat (Catha edulis), smoking, family history of H. pylori infections and PUD, recurrent infection, treatments and BMI. However, there was no significant association with residency, gender, vegetables and fruits eating and coffee and tea drinking. While the results of SAT showed significant association at (P < 0.05) with age groups, education levels, vegetables and fruits eating, recurrent infection and treatments. On the other hand, there was no significant association with residency, gender, coffee and tea drinking chewing Khat (Catha edulis), smoking, family history of H. pylori infections and PUD, recurrent infection and BMI (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of H. pylori patients and its association with H. pylori infection diagnostic tests
Full size table

In addition, the findings showed that the prevalence of H. pylori infections by rapid anti H. pylori test were 200 (100%), 157 (78.5%) by serum H. pylori IgG antibody and 108 (54%) by SAT (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The prevalence of H. pylori infections by different tests

Full size image

Clinically, the findings of the present study demonstrated the classification of different stages of H. pylori infections. 16 (8%) of the patients were negative for confirmatory tests by both serum H. pylori IgG antibody and SAT (no infections), 27 (13.5%) were only positive for SAT (acute infections), 76 (38%) were only positive for serum H. pylori IgG antibody test (chronic infections) and 81 (40.5%) were positive for both serum H. pylori IgG antibody and SAT (active chronic infections) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Classification of different stages of H. pylori infections

Full size image

Interestingly, the results demonstrated that 42 (21%) of the patients had abnormal level of CEA, 30 (15%) had abnormal level of CA19-9 and 31(15.5%) had abnormal level of CA72-4. In addition the Table 2 show mean and SD of tumor markers for patients.

Table 2 Serum levels of some tumor markers among patients with H. pylori infections
Full size table

Clinically, the data showed that there was statistical significant positive correlation between H. pylori IgG antibody and tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4) which was measured by correlation coefficient and linear regression with B = 14.97, 15.70 and 12.91 and r2 = 0.439, 0.287 and 0.582 for CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 respectively, (Table 3) and (Fig. 3). Additionally, the (mean ± SD) of tumor markers level (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4) were significantly increased in patients with SAT positive (P < 0.05), as show in (Table 4).

Table 3 Correlation between serum levels of tumor markers and serum H. pylori IgG Antibody
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The correlation between serum H. pylori IgG antibody and tumor markers

Full size image
Table 4 Association between serum levels of tumor markers and stool antigen test
Full size table

Importantly, the findings showed the association between serum tumor markers levels and different age groups. There was statistically significant difference between serum tumor markers levels and different age groups at (P < 0.05) represented by mean ± SD for CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, which was in the age group more than 59 years old were significantly higher than other groups. In addition, there was statistically significant increase in serum tumor markers levels (CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4) at (P < 0.05) as in symptomatic patients in comparison to non-symptomatic ones Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 Comparison of serum tumor markers levels among different age groups
Full size table
Table 6 Comparison of serum tumor markers levels with symptoms
Full size table

Finally, the results indicated that the serum tumor markers levels were associated with different H. pylori infection status. There were a significantly increased in active chronic infection group as (mean ± SD) of CEA (4.02 ± 2.34), CA19-9 (26.44 ± 14.73), and CA72-4 (5.28 ± 2.49) than other patients groups (P < 0.05). In addition, the results indicated that there were statistically significant difference of serum tumor markers levels based on infection duration, the (mean ± SD) of serum tumor markers levels CEA (3.99 ± 2.16) CA19-9 (26.86 ± 13.52), and CA72-4 (4.850 ± 2.806) respectively, which were the highest in the group with more than 3 years of H. pylori infection (Table 7) and (Table 8).

Table 7 Comparison of serum tumor markers levels among different H. pylori infection status
Full size table
Table 8 Comparison of serum tumor markers levels among different H. pylori infection duration
Full size table

Discussion

Yemen is a developing country with high seroprevalence of H. pylori infections which is the most common infection of about 75–82.2%. These high percentages are due to the lack of proper sanitation, lack of safe drinking water, bad hygienic habits, eating of vegetables and chewing Khat (Catha edulis) without improper washing or contamination of sewage water through rinsing these plants in agriculture, poor diets and overcrowding of some Yemeni population [27, 28].

The results of the current study, revealed that the incidence of H. pylori infections by rapid anti H. pylori test were (100%), (78.5%) by serum H. pylori IgG antibody and (54%) by SAT as it is shown in Fig. 1.

The finding of the current study were consistent with several previous studies such as [29] which reported that 48.3% of the study subjects tested positive for H. pylori IgG while 28.2% tested positive for SAT. Similarly a study conducted in Yemen [30] found that 72% of the participants tested positive for blood antibody test, and 49% tested positive for SAT.

Another study, [31] also supported the results of the current study by reporting a high positivity for serum antibodies compared to antigen in stool. Study [32] further supported the findings of the present study by reporting a seroprevalence of 78.4% for H. pylori infection using H. pylori serum IgG ELISA. In Oman, study [33] found a seroprevalence of 69.5% of H. pylori infection based on serum IgG ELISA in individuals aged 15–50 years. However, the results of the present study contradicted a study conducted by [34] in Kingdom Saudi Arabia which showed a prevalence of 28.3% for H. pylori using ELISA to detect serum H. pylori IgG antibody.

In the present study 54% of study subjects tested positive for SAT, which aligned with the findings of [35] which also reported a 54% positive rate of SAT. Additionally, [30] found that 49% of the participants were diagnosed as positive for H. pylori infection and 51% as negative based on SAT.

The detection of H. pylori stool antigen and the urea breath test (UBT) are reliable indicators for identifying ongoing (active) H. pylori infection; whereas serological testing of H. pylori IgG antibodies indicate a previous (past or long standing infection) as infection become more chronic, the shedding of H. pylori decreases which is often seen in the older individuals [36]. Another study by [37], showed that the gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection status was considered positive on the concordance of at least two different tests in other term the most accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection is achieved when at least two different tests are used and show consistent results.

The study conducted by [38] found a lower rate of positive results for the SAT compared to the current study with a positivity rate of 45%. However the present study contraindicated the results of [39] who reported a SAT positivity rate 82% and [40] which found a SAT positivity rate of 32.22% in their study subjects. Another study by [3] highlighted that H. pylori infection remains a significant public health issue, with an estimated 4.4 billion individuals worldwide testing positive for H. pylori, the chronic H. pylori infection. This chronic infection is typically acquired during childhood.

The findings of the current study revealed a significant association (P < 0.05) between serum H. pylori IgG antibody level and various factors including age groups, education levels, chewing Khat (Catha edulis), smoking, family history of H. pylori infections and PUD, recurrent infection, treatments, and BMI values. However, no significant association were found with residency, gender, vegetables and fruit eating, or coffee and drinking tea. Additionally, the present study demonstrated significant associations (P < 0.05) between SAT results and age groups, education levels, consumption of vegetables and fruit eating, recurrent infection, and treatments. Conversely, no significant association were found with residency, gender, coffee and tea drinking, chewing Khat (Catha edulis), smoking, family history of H. pylori infections and PUD, recurrent infection, or BMI. These association are presented in Table 1.

The finding of this study were consistent with previous research [41], which found no significant difference in H. pylori infection between males and females (P ˃ 0.05) this also supported by another study [42]. However, the finding of the current study contradict the finding of [43], who a statistically significant association between seropositivity of H. pylori and gender. On the other hand, this study align with the findings of [44], which found a higher prevalence of H. pylori infection among patients who chewed Khat (Catha edulis). In contrast [45] didn’t find a significant difference in H. pylori infection based on Khat (Catha edulis) chewing. Several studies have suggested that smoking is a risk factor for various diseases including GC, as well as H. pylori infection [45,46,47]. The current study found that serum H. pylori IgG antibody levels were significantly higher in smokers compared to non-smokers (P < 0.05), which contradicts the findings of [48] who no significant difference in H. pylori infection between smokers and nonsmokers (P ˃ 0.05).

In regarding residency, the results of the present study were in agreement with [49] who found no significant difference in H. pylori infection between patients from urban and rural areas (P ˃ 0.05).

Additionally the current study revealed a positive correlation between serum H. pylori IgG antibody levels and BMI (P < 0.05), which is supported by previous studies that demonstrating an association between H. pylori infection and BMI [50,51,52,53].

Furthermore, the present study was consistent with a study conducted by [54] which found a significant association between H. pylori infection and history of PUD (P < 0.05). In contrast, the results of the current were disagreed with a study by [55] which found no statistical significant difference in H. pylori infection based on family history of PUD.

Chronic H. pylori infection is most commonly observed in the antrum of the stomach in developed countries, and it is usually linked to duodenal ulcers. In contrast, H. pylori infection in developing countries tends to be more localized in the corpus. In this case, H. pylori infection initiates a series of the cascade events including CG, gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and eventually invasive carcinoma [56, 57].

Anti H. pylori antibody, CA724, CA19-9, and CEA are all markers for early GC screening. However, their levels and their correlation with clinicopathological features of young patients with early GC, as well as their role in evaluating postoperative recurrence, metastasis, and death have not been extensively studied [11].

H. pylori infections is the most common cause of gastritis and gastritis is a precursor to GC. Many studies have reported that serum CEA levels increase in some benign diseases such as gastritis and there is a significant difference between patients diagnosed with gastritis before the development of GC [58,59,60].

Importantly, the results of the present study demonstrated that 42 (21%) of patients had abnormal level of CEA, 30 (15%) had abnormal level of CA19-9 and 31(15.5%) had abnormal level of CA72-4, as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between serum H. pylori IgG antibody and tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4). Additionally, the results showed that tumor markers levels were significantly correlated with level of serum H. pylori IgG antibody with B = 14.97, 15.70, 12.91 and r2 = 0.439, 0.287, 0.582 for CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 respectively. Additionally, there was statistically significant difference in tumor markers levels CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 based on SAT status, with higher levels observed in patients with SAT positive (P < 0.05) as shown in Tables 3, 4 and Fig. 3.

The current study findings were in agreement with [26] which found that subjects in the H. pylori infection group had significantly higher levels of CEA, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and CA7-24 compared to those in the H. pylori negative group. Another study [61], also reported a correlation between CEA level and H. pylori IgG levels where CEA levels were higher in patients who tested positive to H. pylori IgG compared to those who tested negative. Similar results were reported in other studies, which demonstrated elevated levels of CEA in the H. pylori infected group [11, 24, 25]. Serum CEA was also found to be significantly associated with anti- H. pylori antibody levels and severity of GC [11].

In study conducted on adults, it was found that there is a significant positive correlation between serum CEA levels and H. pylori infection. Additionally, the study observed that serum CA 74-2 levels were elevated in individuals with H. pylori infection compared to those without the infection. This findings shed light on the association between H. pylori infection and the development of in the incidence of gastric, pancreatic, and lung cancers [26]. Another study [62] reported elevated levels of CA72-4 in patients with H. pylori infection, and the levels returned to normal after two courses of eradication therapy. Furthermore, another study [11] indicated that serum CA72-4 is associated to the presence of H. pylori infection.

The present study supported the previous study [63] that showed a relation between H. pylori infection related and elevated levels of CEA in the serum. Another study [64] found that tumor markers such as CEA, CA19-9 and AFP were prognostic factors for GC and that H. pylori infection is most common cause of GC. Additionally, a study [12] found that GC developed in patients with H. pylori infection but not in those without the infections.

In addition, [65], who reported that CEA, CA19-9 were high in benign gastric disease, these result was in agreement with many previous results which showed the correlation between H. pylori gastritis and levels of these tumor markers and compare the value of four tumor markers (CEA,CA72-4, CA19-9 and CA125) were increased in early GC.

As well as study of [66] reported the association between level of CEA and CA19-9 among benign gastric disease with high mean of both tumor markers, this means that benign gastric disease like gastritis may lead to increase levels of serum tumor markers and thus can be used to know the possible development of H. pylori infection to GC.

The results of our study with previous studies confirmed the association between H. pylori infection and several varieties of cancer, which proved from positive associations between H. pylori infection and the development of GC [67,68,69].

Another study [70] reported that high CA72-4 value is correlated with GU. In addition, the long duration of H. pylori infections and high CEA value are positively associated with high CA72-4 levels.

Furthermore, the findings of the present study found that serum level of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 was significantly higher among H. pylori infected patients with SAT positive, and it might develop into GC as reported by many studies that atrophic gastritis is a well-recognized precancerous lesion, and it might develop into GC [59, 71,72,73]. In addition [74], reported that there was increase in CEA and CA19-9 in H. pylori positive patients in comparison to H. pylori negative, this may indicate with increase inflammatory process due to H. pylori infections; the level of tumor markers mostly increased. Other previous study showed that acute H. pylori infection also causes elevated levels of CEA, indicating that in GC suspected patients the influence of inflammation on CEA levels should not be excluded [24, 75]. In the other study [61] reported that CEA level was correlated to the level of H. pylori IgG where that CEA level was higher in patients who were positive to H. pylori IgG in comparison to negative patient. In addition our study was in agreement with [63] who indicated that H. pylori infection was related to the level of CEA in the host serum. Meng et al. [64] found that tumor markers including CEA, CA19-9, and AFP were demonstrated to be prognostic factors for GC. In addition, [12] found that H. pylori is most common cause of GC; this fact indicated by that GC developed in patients with H. pylori infection than non-infected ones.

Interestingly, the current study found a significant association between serum tumor markers levels and different age groups with a statistically significant difference observed (P < 0.05) as shown in Table 5. In addition, there was a statistically significant increase in serum tumor markers levels CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 among symptomatic patients in comparison to non-symptomatic ones, at (P < 0.05) as shown in Table 5.

The results of this study were in agreement other studies which report that CEA level was significantly associated with age (P < 0.05) [42, 76].

The finding of this study showed that serum tumor markers levels were associated with different H. pylori infection status. Furthermore, serum levels of tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 were significantly higher in patients with active chronic infection (positive for both serum H. pylori IgG antibody and SAT) compared to other groups at (P < 0.05) as shown in Table 7. In addition, there was statistically significant difference of serum tumor markers levels based on infection duration, as shown in Table 8.

Many previous studies, including the case control studies have shown an increase in serum levels of tumor markers in the development of GC in H. pylori infected individuals and increasing with the long duration of seropositivity. Serum H. pylori IgG antibodies indicated to chronic H. pylori infection, the current study found that there was relation between chronic H. pylori infections and serum tumor markers at Ibb governorate. The patients with H. pylori infections had a higher CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 levels and the levels of these markers usually significantly associated with H. pylori infection status. These results were corresponded with many previous studies, which have shown an increase odds ratio for the development of GC in H. pylori infected individuals, it is also associated with the duration of seropositivity of H. pylori IgG [77,78,79].

Same results also was obtained by [80] who reported that patients with H. pylori infection have significantly higher levels of CEA, AFP and CA724 than those in the H. pylori negative group. Further studies focusing on the association between H. pylori infection and cancer risks illustrated that H. pylori infection might be an independent carcinogenic risk factor. The one of the possible mechanisms of oncogenic transformation is H. pylori infection that triggers inflammation resulting in interactions between the bacteria and host cells in local and distant microenvironments [81].

Contributions of the current study. First: it is the first study in Ibb governorate, Yemen to diagnose H. pylori infection using various tests to identify the different types of H. pylori infection; chronic, acute and active chronic infection. Second: it is the first study in Yemen to determine the correlation between serum H. pylori IgG antibody and serum level of more than one tumor markers including CEA, CA19-19 and CA72-4.

Limitations

Two important limitations need to be acknowledged and referred to hence. First: due to the time limit and the economic situation in Yemen, the researchers administered the study instruments to (200) patients. Second: there are many difficulties in obtaining the samples and testing it. These obstacles includes war, siege and COVID-19.

In addition to the previously described situations, the researchers hoped to obtain the requirements for diagnosis H. pylori infection based on UBT and molecular diagnostic methods like polymerase chain reaction. However, the situation of our country and the critical stage of the world at that time prevented us from obtaining it. Consequently we used the SAT and serum H. pylori IgG antibodies.

Conclusions

Based on the findings the conclusions of the current study indicated that the serum levels of tumor markers were mostly significant and associated with chronic H. pylori infections. In addition, the findings confirmed that the level of serum tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4) were associated with the levels of IgG antibody and positivity of SAT to H. pylori infections. The patients with active chronic H. pylori infections have increased of serum levels of tumor markers. Thus, consequence may be associated with GC in these patients.

Availability of data and materials

The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical consideration. The corresponding can provide the data that support the findings of the study upon request.

Abbreviations

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

CA19-9:

Cancer antigen 19-9

CA72-4:

Cancer asntigen 72-4

CagA:

Cytotoxin associated gene

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CG:

Chronic gastritis

ECLIA:

Electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay

ELISA:

Enzyme immunoassay

GC:

Gastric cancer

GU:

Gastric ulcer

H. pylori:

Helicobacter pylori

PU:

Peptic ulcer

PUD:

Peptic ulcer disease

SAT:

Stool antigen test

SD:

Standard deviation

SPSS:

Statistical package of social science program

UBT:

Urea breath test

VacA:

Vacuolating cytotoxin A

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Krzyżek P, Grande R. Transformation of Helicobacter pylori into coccoid forms as a challenge for research determining activity of antimicrobial substances. Pathogens. 2020;9(3):184.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mao X, Jakubovics NS, Bächle M, Buchalla W, Hiller K-A, Maisch T, et al. Colonization of Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity–an endless controversy? Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021;47(5):612–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hooi JK, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MM, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(2):420–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang WL, Yeh YC, Sheu BS. The impacts of H. pylori virulence factors on the development of gastroduodenal diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(1):68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Espinoza-Contreras JG, Torres-Ruiz MI, Waller-González LA, Ramírez-García JDJ, Torres-López J, Ventura-Juárez J, et al. Immunological markers and Helicobacter pylori in patients with stomach cancer: expression and correlation. Biomed Rep. 2020;12(5):233–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wroblewski LE, Shen L, Ogden S, Romero-Gallo J, Lapierre LA, Israel DA, et al. Helicobacter pylori dysregulation of gastric epithelial tight junctions by urease-mediated myosin II activation. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(1):236–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olivera-Severo D, Uberti AF, Marques MS, Pinto MT, Gomez-Lazaro M, Figueiredo C, et al. A new role for Helicobacter pylori urease: contributions to angiogenesis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1883.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Atherton J, Axon AT, Bazzoli F, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2012;61(5):646–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fock KM, Graham DY, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter pylori research: historical insights and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(8):495.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotilea K, Bontems P, Touati E. Epidemiology, diagnosis and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter Pylori Hum Dis Adv Microbiol Infect Dis Pub Health. 2019;11:17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gong X, Zhang H. Diagnostic and prognostic values of anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody combined with serum CA724, CA19-9, and CEA for young patients with early gastric cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(7):e23268.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(11):784–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Plummer M, Franceschi S, Vignat J, Forman D, de Martel C. Global burden of gastric cancer attributable to Helicobacter pylori. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(2):487–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Martel C, Ferlay J, Franceschi S, Vignat J, Bray F, Forman D, et al. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(6):607–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto Y, Marusawa H, Kinoshita K, Endo Y, Kou T, Morisawa T, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection triggers aberrant expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase in gastric epithelium. Nat Med. 2007;13(4):470.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hartung ML, Gruber DC, Koch KN, Grüter L, Rehrauer H, Tegtmeyer N, et al. H pylori-induced DNA strand breaks are introduced by nucleotide excision repair endonucleases and promote NF-κB target gene expression. Cell Rep. 2015;13(1):70–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh P, Tiwari SP, Mehdi MM, Sharma R. Role of bacterial infection (H. pylori) in colon carcinogenesis and therapeutic approaches. In: Vishvakarma NK, Nagaraju GP, Shukla D, editors. Colon cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 109–42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar S, Metz DC, Ellenberg S, Kaplan DE, Goldberg DS. Risk factors and incidence of gastric cancer after detection of Helicobacter pylori infection: a large cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(3):527-36e7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X-Z, Zhang W-K, Yang K, Wang L-L, Liu J, Wang L, et al. Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(9):9031–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun Z, Zhang N. Clinical evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12(1):397.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jing J, Zheng S, Han C, Du L, Guo Y, Wang P. Evaluating the value of uPAR of serum and tissue on patients with cervical cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2012;26(1):16–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Căinap C, Nagy V, Gherman A, Cetean S, Laszlo I, Constantin A-M, et al. Classic tumor markers in gastric cancer. Curr Stand Limit Clujul Med. 2015;88(2):111.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin J-P, Lin J-X, Ma Y-B, Xie J-W, Yan S, Wang J-B, et al. Prognostic significance of pre-and post-operative tumour markers for patients with gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(3):418–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gong Y, Wei W, Jingwei L, Nannan D, Yuan Y. Helicobacter pylori infection status correlates with serum parameter levels responding to multi-organ functions. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(6):1748–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang J, Cui J. Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with chronic hepatic disease. Chin Med J. 2017;130(2):149.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu M-Y, Cao B, Chen Y, Musial N, Wang S, Yin J, et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and tumor markers: an observational retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e022374.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gunaid AA, Hassan NA, Murray-Lyon I. Prevalence and risk factors for Helicobacter pylori infection among Yemeni dyspeptic patients. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(5):512–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Makdad A, Al-Dholaee M, Thabet A, Al-Haimi M, Balfaqih O, Al-Hadad A. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Yemeni patients. Yemeni J Med Sci. 2013;7:33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Omosor K, Omosor O, Adejumo B, Ibeh I, Dimkpa U. Comparative evaluation of stool antigen immunoassay and blood antibody test methods for the screening of Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic adult population in Delta State, Nigeria. J Mol Microbiol. 2018;2(1):3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Naji AS, Ameri G, Alkadasi MN, Hanash S, Ali W, Zaid A. Comparison of stool antigen and blood antibody test methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk factors. Int J Curr Microbiol. 2014;3(12):118–27.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kazemi S, Tavakkoli H, Habizadeh MR, Emami MH. Diagnostic values of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests: stool antigen test, urea breath test, rapid urease test, serology and histology. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(9):1097.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bener A, Uduman SA, Ameen A, Alwash R, Pasha MA, Usmani MA, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among low socio-economic workers. J Commun Dis. 2002;34(3):179–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Balushi MS, Al-Busaidi JZ, Al-Daihani MS, Shafeeq MO, Hasson SS. Sero-prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among asymptomatic healthy Omani blood donors. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2013;3(2):146–9.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanafi MI, Mohamed AM. Helicobacter pylori infection: seroprevalence and predictors among healthy individuals in Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2013;88(1):40–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Antoš D, Crone J, Konstantopoulos N, Koletzko S. Evaluation of a novel rapid one-step immunochromatographic assay for detection of monoclonal Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples from children. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2598–601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mårdh E, Mårdh S, Mårdh B, Borch K. Diagnosis of gastritis by means of a combination of serological analyses. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;320(1–2):17–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. JeongMin C, ChungHyeon K, DongHee K, SuJin C, JiHyun S, JungMook K, et al. Prospective evaluation of a new stool antigen test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test, and serology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(6):1053–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mabeku LBK, Epesse MB, Fotsing S, Kamgang R, Tchidjo M. Stool antigen testing, a reliable noninvasive method of assessment of Helicobacter pylori infection among patients with gastro-duodenal disorders in Cameroon. Digest Dis Sci. 2020;66:511.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Talebi Bezmin Abadi A. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori using invasive and noninvasive approaches. J Pathog. 2018. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2018/9064952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Prell C, Osterrieder S, Lottspeich C, Schwarzer A, Rüssmann H, Ossiander G, et al. Improved performance of a rapid office-based stool test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in children before and after therapy. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(12):3980–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Ardawi EJR, Al-Hussaini RM, Al-asady HMK, Sahib AA, Tizkam HH. Prevalence and association of Helicobacter pylori infection with gastritis and its age and sex distribution in a population of Karbala. Drug Invent Today. 2019;12(11):2571.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moon H-W, Lee S-Y, Hur M, Yun Y-M. Characteristics of Helicobacter pylori-seropositive subjects according to the stool antigen test findings: a prospective study. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33(5):893.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mathewos B, Moges B, Dagnew M. Seroprevalence and trend of Helicobacter pylori infection in Gondar University Hospital among dyspeptic patients, Gondar, North West Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6(1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Al-Awadhi E, Bahaj S, Al-Oferi B. Helicobacter pylori infection among patients with type II diabetes mellitus. J Diab Metab Disorder Control. 2020;7(2):53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Abdu A, Cheneke W, Adem M, Belete R, Getachew A. Dyslipidemia and associated factors among patients suspected to have Helicobacter pylori Infection at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, Ethiopia. Int J Gener Med. 2020;13:311.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Butt J, Varga MG. Smoking helicobacter pylori serology, and gastric cancer risk in prospective studies from China, Japan, and Korea. Cancer Prev Res. 2019;12(10):667–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Jiang C, Chen Q, Xie M. Smoking increases the risk of infectious diseases: A narrative review. Tob Induc Dis. 2020;18:60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Odigie A, Adewole A, Ekunwe A. Prevalence and factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection among treatment naïve dyspeptic adults in University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2020;21(2):97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Maleki I, Mohammadpour M, Zarrinpour N, Khabazi M, Mohammadpour RA. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Sari Northern Iran; a population based study. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2019;12(1):31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Y, Du T, Chen X, Yu X, Tu L, Zhang C. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and overweight or obesity in a Chinese population. J Infect Dev Count. 2015;9(09):945–53.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Al-Akwaa AM. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a group of morbidly obese Saudi patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a preliminary report. Saudi J Gastroenterol Offic J Saudi Gastroenterol Assoc. 2010;16(4):264.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lee SP, Lee S-Y, Kim JH, Sung I-K, Park HS, Shim CS. Factors related to upper gastrointestinal symptom generation in 2275 Helicobacter pylori seroprevalent adults. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(6):1561–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Furuto Y, Kawamura M, Yamashita J, Yoshikawa T, Namikawa A, Isshiki R, et al. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and arteriosclerosis. Int J Gener Med. 2021;14:1533.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Alzoubi H, Al-Mnayyis A, Aqel A, Abu-Lubad M, Hamdan O, Jaber K. The use of 13C-Urea breath test for non-invasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in comparison to endoscopy and stool antigen test. Diagnostics. 2020;10(7):448.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Aitila P, Mutyaba M, Okeny S, Ndawula Kasule M, Kasule R, Ssedyabane F, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection among children aged 1 to 15 years at holy innocents children’s hospital, Mbarara, South Western Uganda. J Trop Med. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2019/9303072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Tasci B, Gurler M. Retrospective evaluation of the role of CA19-9, CEA and hematological parameters in the prediction of Helicobacter pylori, gastritis etiology and endoscopic lesions. Ulutas Med J. 2022;8(1):64.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Smith VC, Genta RM. Role of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric neoplasia. Microsc Res Tech. 2000;48(6):313–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Iwasaki Y, Arai K, Katayanagi S, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto H, et al. Biomarkers for neoplasmas in digestive organs. Gan to kagaku ryoho Cancer Chemother. 2004;31(7):1015–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Turk O. The diagnostic value of tumor markers and endoscopy in patients with gastric disorders. Arch Clin Exp Surg. 2015;4(2):74–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Flores-Luna L, Bravo MM, Kasamatsu E, Lazcano Ponce EC, Martinez T, Torres J, et al. Risk factors for gastric precancerous and cancers lesions in Latin American counties with difference gastric cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;64:101630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang QY, Lv Z, Sun LP, Dong NN, Xing CZ, Yuan Y. Clinical significance of serum markers reflecting gastric function and H. pylori infection in colorectal cancer. J Cancer. 2019;10(10):2229.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Buzás GM, Inappropriate CA. 72–4 elevation in a Helicobacter pylori infected patient. Z Gastroenterol. 2016;54(5):431–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Qiu HB, Zhang LY, Keshari RP, Wang GQ, Zhou ZW, Xu DZ, et al. Relationship between H. pylori infection and clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:374.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Meng Q, Shi S, Liang C, Liang D, Xu W, Ji S, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:4591.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ai-Ping Yang JL, Lei HY, Zhang QW, Zhao L, Yang GH. CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;437:183–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. He C-Z, Zhang K-H, Li Q, Liu X-H, Hong Y, Lv N-H. Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13(1):87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zuo Y, Jing Z, Bie M, Xu C, Hao X, Wang B. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(37):e21832.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Xuan S-Y, Xin Y-N, Chen A-J, Dong Q-J, Qiang X, Li N, et al. Association between the presence of H pylori in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(2):307–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhuo WL, Zhu B, Xiang ZL, Zhuo XL, Cai L, Chen ZT. Assessment of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res. 2009;40(5):406–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hu P-J, Chen M-Y, Wu M-S, Lin Y-C, Shih P-H, Lai C-H, et al. Clinical evaluation of CA72-4 for screening gastric cancer in a healthy population: a multicenter retrospective study. Cancers. 2019;11(5):733.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Annibale B, Esposito G, Lahner E. A current clinical overview of atrophic gastritis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;14(2):93–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Qian S, Golubnitschaja O, Zhan X. Chronic inflammation: Key player and biomarker-set to predict and prevent cancer development and progression based on individualized patient profiles. Epma J. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s13167-019-00194-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Qadri Q, Rasool R, Gulzar GM, Naqash S, Shah ZAH. pylori infection, inflammation and gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014;45(2):126–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kayapinar A, Solakoglu D, Bas K, Oymaci E, Isbilen B, Calik B, et al. Relationship of prognostic factors in stomach cancer with Helicobacter pylori: a retrospective study. Acta Gastro-Enterol Belg. 2021;84(4):607–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Wu X, Peng B, Qian K, Zhang W, Min J, Zhang M, et al. The combination of methylenehydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism screening and gastrointestinal tumor markers detection may be an early screening method for gastrointestinal cancer related to Helicobacter pylori infection. Genes Dis. 2021;8(6):931–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Touitou Y, Proust J, Klinger E, Nakache J-P, Huard D, Sachet A. Cumulative effects of age and pathology on plasma carcinoembryonic antigen in an unselected elderly population. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1984;20(3):369–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cahill RJ, Xia H, Kilgallen C, Beattie S, Hamilton H, Omorain C. Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric epithelial cell proliferation. Digest Dis Sci. 1995;40(8):1627–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Sepulveda AR. Helicobacter, inflammation, and gastric cancer. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2013;1(1):9–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Senchukova MA, Tomchuk O, Shurygina EI. Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer: features of infection and their correlations with long-term results of treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(37):6290.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Xu Y, Zhang P, Zhang K, Huang C. The application of CA72-4 in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gastric cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1876(2):188634.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Hsu WY, Lin CH, Lin CC, Sung FC, Hsu CP, Kao CH. The relationship between Helicobacter pylori and cancer risk. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25(3):235–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Science, Sana’a University, Yemen for providing us with the necessary facilities to carry out this study. Furthermore, great thanks should be given to the specialist doctors and staff in hospitals and clinics in Ibb city, Yemen for their assistance. We owe a great deal to our patients participating in this study.

Funding

There is no participated funding and it is self-funding study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Microbiology Section, Faculty of Science, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen

    Marwan K. Saeed, B. A. Al-Ofairi, M. A. Al-Jahrani & Ahmed M. Abdulkareem

  2. Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen

    Mohammed A. Hassan

  3. Departement of Medical Laboratory, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Queen Arwa University, Sana’a, Yemen

    B. A. Al-Ofairi

  4. Department of Medical Laboratories, University of Science and Technology, Ibb, Yemen

    Marwan K. Saeed

Authors
  1. Marwan K. Saeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. A. Al-Ofairi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammed A. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. Al-Jahrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmed M. Abdulkareem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MKS prepared and wrote the main manuscript, was responsible for conducting the main analysis, interpretation of the results and writing the manuscript, while BAAO contributed to supervision the study, MAH contributed in supervision. AMA and MAAJ were involved in conception the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwan K. Saeed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethically, before performing the current study the researchers took the consents were taken from all the participants and the approval for this study was obtained from the Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences and Dean of Post-graduate Studies & Scientific Research—Sana’a University and administration of hospitals and clinics in Ibb city, Yemen.

Competing interests

There is no conflict of interest that exists among authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeed, M.K., Al-Ofairi, B.A., Hassan, M.A. et al. The clinical significance of some serum tumor markers among chronic patients with Helicobacter pylori infections in Ibb Governorate, Yemen. Infect Agents Cancer 18, 60 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13027-023-00542-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13027-023-00542-7

Keywords

Infectious Agents and Cancer

ISSN: 1750-9378

Contact us